Sunday, June 25, 2017

Repeat Whistleblowing

Repeat Whistleblowing

The Department of Justice (enforcing the False Claims Act), the IRS, and the SEC all pay rewards to whistleblowers whose tips lead to the collection of fines, penalties, or past taxes.  The prospect of large rewards can lead some to file multiple suits.  William LaCorte – derided as a “serial whistleblower” by the Wall Street Journal – won awards of nearly $100 million as a result of filing at least a dozen lawsuits, mostly against pharmaceutical companies. 

For pros like LaCorte, suing pharmaceuticals is almost like shooting fish in a barrel: from 1991 through 2015, 373 fraud suits were settled by these companies for a total of $35.7 billion.  The profusion of Medicare fraud cases enabled the Department of Justice to recover $19.3 billion in wrongful claims from healthcare companies in 2016, including the $785 million result from a LaCorte suit.  Last year the whistleblowing industry earned $516 million in rewards from the DoJ.

Repeat whistleblowers occasionally emerge in companies without the FCA’s financial incentives.  Linda Colon received $125,000 in settlement of a suit against the Housing Authority of the City of Passaic (New Jersey) in October 2012.  The agency continued to harass Colon following the settlement, so last month she sued again, charging that the agency created a hostile work environment.  In her second lawsuit, she included an allegation that the agency violated HUD rules governing rent increases.

While some workers exit dishonest employers, others remain, finding more and more problems until they are fired.  Charles Matthew Erhart was an internal auditor at BofI Holding in 2013 when he discovered that the company violated state law by not informing some customers when it recorded their calls.  Senior BofI executives ordered him not to refer to legal violations in his audit reports, but that did not sit well. 

Erhart proceeded to identify other problems: potentially altered financial reports, late contributions to employee 401k accounts, board failure to approve the company business plan, excessive deposit concentration risk, untruthful responses to an SEC subpoena, customer accounts without taxpayer identification numbers, loans to criminals and politically exposed persons, miscalculated loan and lease losses, and improprieties in the CEO’s personal accounts.  Finally BofI fired him.

Internal auditors, like Erhart, are well positioned to identify multiple instances of wrongdoing.  Carol Bondy, the audit bureau chief at the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, reported multiple misdeeds before the department cutback its audit operations and terminated her.  My role as Chief Financial Officer and Compliance Officer enabled me to discover numerous violations and potential violations at HomeFirst Services before the CEO and Treasurer fired me in June 2014.

Returning a whistleblower to her job following a legal settlement is risky for both sides, as it proved for Colon and the Passaic Housing Authority.  Ricky Hansen, for instance, who disclosed Wells Fargo’s unauthorized customer accounts, was rehired following his settlement, but continuing harassment eventually forced him to quit. 

Robert MacLean complained that a 2003 order by the Department of Homeland Security endangered air transportation.  That led to harassment and his eventual termination.  After a ten-year legal battle, the DHS was ordered to reinstate him.  He spent his first day back testifying to Congress about his fight with DHS, and he has continued to file complaints about other suspected air safety issues.

Companies can avoid the risks associated with returning problem employees by banning them from the premises.  Pennsylvania narcotics agent Charles Horvath called out a supervisor’s attempt to conceal evidence and was harassed, then fired.  In his settlement contract, he agreed not to seek future employment with the state attorney general’s office.  The settlement that HomeFirst proposed to me required that I waive any right to reinstatement with HomeFirst and agree that I would not apply to work there again.

Stephen Cass took a different tack by changing companies.  From 2007 to 2010, he was athletic director at a small private high school in Florida.  After he objected that the school’s admission standards and distribution of financial aid violated Title IX requirements, his contract was not renewed.  He filed a lawsuit, but he also moved north.  In 2013 he became athletic director at a high school in Massachusetts, where he made similar complaints.  Again he was fired, and he sued the school in 2016.

Repeat whistleblowers can muck up the system with their complaints.  The SEC, which pays awards for tips that yield more than $1 million in sanctions, has praised its reward program but admits to the challenge of addressing claims from “serial submitters.”  Perhaps another example: HUD took seven months, not the 20 business days specified by regulation, to reply to my fourth FOIA request concerning HomeFirst’s overbillings.

Critics of whistleblowing cite organizational loyalty as hurdle to clear before the act is ethical[1].  Regardless of ethics, a sense of loyalty to company and colleagues has long been considered an obstacle to potential whistleblowers[2].   But once we have formed our disclosure and, especially, once we have blown the whistle, our concerns over loyalty dissipate.  We are wary of the consequences of future actions but also numb to their supposed ethical obligations.

After HomeFirst fired me, I continued pressing the complaints I had made.  I also reported a potential legal violation by Downtown Streets and a mismanagement issue at a local St. Vincent de Paul operation, two places where I volunteered post-HomeFirst.  Now experienced in the art, I see no reason not to reject what seems wrong or to disclose it to others.

Apply my experience – plus that of LaCourte and the others – to the more than 1 million who blow whistles in the U.S. each year[3], and you discover a growing army of budding repeat whistleblowers.  Unfettered by the bonds of loyalty, these discontents have the potential to act as revolutionaries who stand for good or as tested soldiers willing to destroy what offends them. 






[1] For example, Bok, Sisella. “Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibility.” New York University Education Quarterly 11.4 (1980): 2-10
[2] Peters, Charles, and Taylor Branch.  Blowing the Whistle: Dissent in the Public Interest.  New York: Praeger Publishers.  1972
[3] Based on Navex Global 2016 rate of 1.3 reports per 100 employees and 153 million employed in the U.S. workforce.

No comments:

Post a Comment