Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Truth & Justice in Whistleblowing

Truth & Justice in Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing tests our grasp of truth and justice.  Take James McDonough.

In April 2008 James McDonough and his wife Vanessa bought their home in unincorporated Homestead, Florida.  A year later McDonough, while out for a walk, found the car that had recently driven too fast through his neighborhood.  It belonged to Alejandro Murguido[1], a Homestead police officer.  Murguido encouraged McDonough to come and talk to him about any problem, like a neighbor and gentleman, rather than file a formal complaint.  Good enough.

On October 24, 2012, Gurguido again drove recklessly through their neighborhood.  McDonough was forced to drive off the road to save himself.  On the 29th he visited Murguido’s house and lectured him about lawful driving.  Then he walked away.

Within minutes Murguido raced up behind him in his police cruiser.  Murguido’s friend from across the street, also a policeman, joined him.  Soon six fellow officers arrived.  They detained McDonough, frisked and interrogated him.  Murguido told him not to mess with police officers.  After 90 minutes they let him go with a warning to stay clear of Murguido’s house in the future.

The incident so unsettled McDonough he could not eat or sleep.  He had anxiety attacks.  He called the FBI, who told him to report the matter to the Homestead police internal affairs department.

On November 1, he went to Campbell Urgent Care in Homestead where he told Dr. Ernesto Rodriguez about the incident.  Rodriguez wrote up his report: psychotic, schizophrenic, hallucinations, may need to go to the psych ward per the Baker Act.  Then Rodriguez called the Homestead police.  Officer Blanco arrived and questioned McDonough for two hours before releasing him.

McDonough tried to complain to the Homestead and Miami-Dade County internal affairs offices.  They didn’t return his calls.  He sought help from his State Representative Holly Reschein.  Nothing worked.

At a Citizen Advisory Council (CAC) meeting in February 2013, Major Artime of the Miami-Dade police said he would follow-up with his internal affairs department.  After the meeting two police officers held McDonough and interrogated him for 30 minutes.

Three days later Murguido filed a complaint of felony aggravated stalking and corruption against McDonough.  Homestead internal affairs officer Aquino had advised Muguido to make the charges, which were later dismissed.

In April, five Miami-Dade police officers entered McDonough’s home without a warrant.  They arrested him and hauled him off in handcuffs.  At a Miami-Dade prison he was strip-searched and held for 18 hours.  The charges were finally dropped in January 2014.

In February, McDonough met with Homestead police chief Rolle to discuss his concerns.  Rolle told him the “Police Officers Bill of Rights”, unfortunately, barred McDonough from complaining about the October 2012 incident.  He could, though, complain about Murguido’s revving his motorcycle and chirping his siren outside McDonough’s house a week earlier.  Rolle assigned the investigation to an officer that McDonough told Rolle had infringed his rights.  The officer concluded the complaint was unfounded.

McDonough continued to attend CAC meetings although he was not always allowed to speak.  He attended Homestead city council meetings, but they passed a decorum rule prohibiting comments like those McDonough presented.  He posted notes and recordings of his interactions with police on various online media sites.  He attracted some press attention.

Murguido tried unsuccessfully twice more to get injunctions against McDonough.  Then in December 2014 State Attorney Fernandez-Rundle sent him a cease-and-desist letter[2].  Acting as his own attorney, in January 2015 McDonough sued Fernandez-Rundle.  In July 2017 he won in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

After five years of abuse from Homestead, Maini-Dade county and Monroe county officials, McDonough had had enough.  In August 2017 he and his wife filed (through an attorney) a lawsuit against 36 parties.  Municipalities, police officers, city officials, and the urgent care facility and doctor were all named.  They cited thirty-two causes of action, including unreasonable seizure, warrantless search, false imprisonment, violation of civil rights, and RICO Act and HIPAA violations.

James McDonough’s experiences mirror those of other whistleblowers.  He witnessed a misdeed during the course of his daily activities.  Like many others’ disclosures, the initial violation was not earthshaking.

He tried to report the wrong through established channels but was rebuffed.  Things spun out of control.  He suffered more and increasingly brutal retaliations.  He appealed to higher authorities, but none would protect him.  He developed new skills to fight his opponents.

He and his wife suffered personal attacks.  Authorities called him schizophrenic.  They called her sexually promiscuous.  They published his personal contact information.  They made false statements about them both[3].  The McDonoughs' marriage is stressed to near breaking.

McDonough also presents unique qualities as a whistleblower.  He is not a member of the organization he exposes.  Unless we accept that the offending organization is the body politic.

Most whistleblowers have financial skin in the game.  They hope to recover pay the organization denied them in retaliation for blowing a whistle.  Or they seek a share of penalties imposed on the wrongdoer.  Financial interest opens a kind of Ultimatum Game in which the organization hopes to make the stingiest settlement offer that will not cause the whistleblower to turn away in disgust[4].

McDonough lacks a financial investment in his project.  He and his attackers share no basis for negotiation.  He has only self-respect he will not trade, and they have only their precious power.

McDonough’s and most whistleblower cases struggle with evidence.  Readers often have only the parties’ statements to go on.  We are reluctant to believe our public servants could be so nefarious and commit such outrageous acts against an innocent man and his wife.  We hesitate to believe nonprofit HomeFirst which aims to help homeless people could have done so many things wrong and retaliated against me for reporting them.  Or our government would violate our privacy without good reason as Edward Snowden claimed.

In these cases justice seems elusive.  It can be easier to accept that the whistleblower is crazy, disgruntled, or a performance problem.  Discovering the truth demands long, hard work.




[1] Murguido would be the top producer on the Homestead traffic unit in 2014.
[2] HomeFirst sent me a cease-and-desist letter the year after it fired me because I continued to pursue my disclosures.  Despite my initial panicked reaction, I ignored the letter.
[3] Including that 1) McDonough is aggressive or combative; 2) McDonough is psychotic; 3) McDonough is a schizophrenic who is delusional; 4) McDonough considers himself a “sovereign citizen;” 5) McDonough is threatening and aggressive; 6) McDonough and his wife are crazy; 7) McDonough has a history of clinically diagnosed mental health problems; 8) McDonough is a “Baker Act,” who stalks police; 9) McDonough committed/commits theft of government property/resources; 10) McDonough was committed to a mental institution because his wife sleeps with cops; and 11) McDonough’s children are not his because his wife sleeps with cops.
[4] I found HomeFirst’s offer to me offensive, but my attorney (with his own motivations) advised that it was a good deal.

No comments:

Post a Comment