Whistleblowers Become the Accused
When we blow the whistle, we expect trouble. We just don’t know its full extent.
Blowing the whistle usually leads to some form of
retaliation. That’s to be expected. We broke the group’s rules. We betrayed our boss or coworkers by exposing
someone’s mistake or an outright wrong.
We blew the whistle on our team.
We expect to be shunned.
At times throughout our lives we’ve been rejected when we offended
others. Or we have snubbed another when he
annoyed us.
In business it’s natural to make these punishments financial. By refusing her a promotion, a pay raise or
overtime. By relocating her office. We can be shocked when positive performance
reviews turn negative, but that is a conventional way to send a message. You don’t belong here.
In some industries the injuries can become physical. It happens in law enforcement.
We can even expect to be fired. We are shocked, offended, but not entirely
surprised. Many of us have fired people
in the past. We can’t be naïve.
We know that our boss will not give us a good job reference
when we resist company misbehavior. Some
whistleblowers drop the company from their resume and their linkedin page. That gets tricky when it leads to misstating
job histories. We work around the
problem.
Those are all issues we can anticipate because we have worked
in organizations for years. But there are
legal troubles we don’t usually anticipate.
They can be nerve wracking and expensive.
Debra
Halbrook worked as a legal assistant for a North Carolina district
attorney. The guy was offensive, the way
he always carried his Glock and disrespectfully adopted images of her strict
Christian faith. She reported behavior
she thought was wrong to State authorities.
The DA fired her. She sued. Her attorney went full bore. He charged
him with wrongful termination but also with racketeering offenses,
obstruction of justice, civil conspiracy, and more.
Now the DA has gone
after Halbrook and others. His suit
charges Halbrook with racketeering, obstruction of justice, and civil
conspiracy. He also sued her attorney
for abuse of process. Pursuing a
whistleblower lawsuit can be expensive, but defending yourself against a rabid
former employer involves costs you never imagined.
Others have been sued over their whistleblower claims. Theodore
Schiff won his FCA
suit against dermatologist Gary Marder, who settled with the Department of
Justice for $18 million. Marder said he
would sue Schiff for things he had said.
MJS and Associates, a health care consulting company, lost $65 million
in an FCA suit brought by Matthew
Master. It then sued Master for
breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, among other things. Fortunately for Master, a court dismissed the
suit.
Sometimes companies sue employees for their whistleblowing actions
before they were fired. Nick
Ramler’s former employer claimed he tried to use his evidence of wrongdoing
to blackmail his boss into not firing him.
Todd
Barretta, chief compliance officer for NJ Transit, was sued for breaching
his duty of loyalty to the agency. Elderick
Brass, a former prison guard, was charged with a felony for releasing a
video of a guard firing a tear gas canister at an inmate.
Organizations always try to justify firing the employee for
reasons unrelated to whistleblowing.
That can protect them from the eventual wrongful termination
lawsuit. And the wrongs they find can
prove expensive for the whistleblowers.
Johnny
Burris accused JP Morgan of pushing its investment products to customers
for whom they were inappropriate. The
bank fired him, and he sued. As justification,
the bank said Burris misused JP Morgan letterhead paper and he failed to
execute a customer trade causing the customer to lose $624. Fighting that charge at FINRA
cost him $50,000 plus the $5,000 fine.
Megan
Elizabeth NIsewarner called out contract irregularities in her school
district among other wrongdoings.
Unfortunately, a search warrant resulted in finding marijuana in her
home. Possession charges were eventually
dropped, but the district still used the discovery as reason for firing her.
If the whistleblower loses her suit, losses can mount. Parsippany (NJ) township charged James
Carifi illegally downloaded files he used as evidence of misdeeds. He had to defend himself against that. Then when he lost his whistleblower suit, he
had to pay the township $164,000 for its legal costs. Janice
Marrin claimed her complaints about lax hospital procedures led to her
being fired. After she lost her lawsuit,
she was ordered to pay the hospital’s defense costs.
Organizations like to hold the threat of lawsuits over
former employees who might talk about their cases. HomeFirst
proposed a settlement agreement to me that barred me from discussing the
settlement or my employment with HomeFirst.
A friend of a friend of mine settled with a large bank that insisted on
nondisclosure. The bank requires annual
depositions to make sure she hasn’t discussed it with anyone. Otherwise she can deal with them in court.
I refused HomeFirst’s settlement, but still it blustered. When I continued to follow-up on my
complaints about its behavior, it sent me a letter
threatening legal action. I did not
stop, and I never heard from it again.
The California
Bar said the HomeFirst attorney had the right to threaten legal action if I
defamed the company. But, of course,
that was not exactly the warning its attorney intended.
Sometimes whistleblowers are burned when they don’t
stop. Blue Shield of California fired Michael
Johnson after he complained the nonprofit behaved more like a for-profit
company. Johnson has continued to be
publicly vocal. And he battles Blue
Shield’s lawsuit trying to get him to stop revealing what it considers
confidential information.
When we start on our whistleblowing ventures, we envision a
limited field of action. We
simplify. We see ourselves as moral
champions, not as dissatisfied and a little vengeful. We ignore the fact that the organization will
quite reasonably seek its own revenge against us. Its attacks will be fueled by resources we
cannot always match. It will attempt
further acts we don’t imagine.
No comments:
Post a Comment