Whistleblowers Remain Right
Whistleblowers are right making in their allegations. I was.
I think others are, too. But outsiders
can come to different conclusions.
After Attorney General Barr released his letter on the
Mueller investigation, David Brooks at the New York Times wrote
about our craziness on the subject of President Trump.
Over the past two years, many people on the left have stood
up and denounced collusion by Trump and his allies with the Russians. They called him out as a traitor. They risked retaliation by the party in power
for their accusations.
During the same period, many on the right have denounced the
Mueller investigation. The claim of
collusion was all a hoax,
they said. Worse, it posed the threat
of a coup against a legitimately elected government, according to them. Lefties mocked them and their fantasies.
Now that the investigation is done, evidence of collusion by
the Trump administration didn’t
prove criminality beyond a reasonable doubt. Mueller’s work, however, led to charges
against 37 defendants, including 6 Trump associates. Brooks says both sides should take a breath. They should see this as an opportunity to
show some humility. Maybe some should
even apologize for their heated comments.
But, Brooks warns, scandals like this are a mainstay of current
political life. They are the bases for
our competing senses of superiority.
The same thing goes for organizational life witnessed by whistleblowers.
After none of my many
allegations of misconduct by HomeFirst
Services stuck, I never saw reason to apologize for bringing them up. It seemed to me that I had every right to challenge
them although that triggered
HomeFirst’s decision to fire me. So I
did.
HomeFirst Board members were stalwart in their defense of
the CEO’s handling of possible violations.
They called me Mr.
Bleak for my repeated warnings that the company could run out of money in
the coming months. When they needed a bail-out
from Santa Clara County (Calif.) to cover payroll, no one called to thank
me for the heads up.
Once whistleblowers lose their cases, they usually vanish
from view. Excepting some big names like
Daniel Ellsberg and Edward Snowden and a few smaller players who
hang on. Some flog their cases in the
courts beyond what good sense explains – Robert
Purcell stayed at it for 18 years. Others,
like Jessie
Guitron, periodically float into interviews years after being fired. For the rest, media indifference keeps private
how they adapt to losing.
The organizations are more likely to justify themselves publicly. Wells Fargo, Guitron’s former employer, was hit by
fines, subjected to nasty
publicity, and lost
two CEOs, and it says it has transformed
itself. Transformation, though, did not include apologizing to Guitron or
the hundreds
of others it retaliated against.
It’s hard to know when you should give up a strongly held conviction. That’s true for whistleblowers at each stage
of their projects – when they first see a wrong, when they tell their bosses,
when they report it internally and then externally. It’s equally true for their organizations and
for both critics and supporters of the President.
In The
Gentle Art of Swedish Death Cleaning, Margareta Magnusson guides readers
through discarding the physical accumulations of their lives. She encourages us to give things up to
simplify our living, to move what we don’t need to better homes, and to make it
easier for others when we die.
I heeded her advice first in my kitchen. I tossed spices unused for years and foods
with best-used-by dates in 2012. I set
in the compost bin soba noodles, tiny black lentils, colorful dry beans I’d
been given years ago, and an expired cheese making kit. The resulting cupboards appeared to belong to
a less interesting person, I’m afraid.
That is part of the problem with giving up our opinions,
even after they are shown to be faulty or unproductive. Without them, we can be seen as less vital,
less significant, and less alive.
Sometimes it just feels better to keep flogging our
case. I kept reporting new problems at
HomeFirst even after it was obvious the CEO and Board would do nothing about
them. I fight now to give up thinking
that Trump did indeed collude with the Russians.
No comments:
Post a Comment