When Whistleblowing Is Foolish
We like to think our whistleblowing is heroic. We stand by our consciences. Setting selfish interests aside, we act to
benefit the community. But lots of
times, especially in retrospect, it’s clear we are simply fools, going about it
as we do.
Terry
Albury was born in Northern California in 1979. While studying at Berea College in Kentucky,
he interned with the FBI. After graduation
he joined the FBI, becoming an agent in 2005.
From 2009 to 2010, he served in Iraq with duties that included
interviewing Iraqi detainees. He returned
to the US in 2012 and was stationed in the Minneapolis field office where he served
in an counter-terrorism squad.
Albury was a straight arrow.
Perhaps because his mother was a political refugee from Ethiopia, he had
a well-developed sense of social justice.
He was a Big Brother. At the time
of his arrest he was happily married. His
wife, whose parents were Cambodian refugees, thought of following him into law
enforcement but put her career on hold to raise their two children. He won many awards from the FBI. At his sentencing, his attorneys described
him as a consummate
professional.
Life can be difficult for people of color in America. Minnesota
ranks 8th among states in the percentage of whites in its
population. The FBI has had issues with
diversity, and Albury was the only black in its Minnesota office. He complained of racial jokes and hazing. He felt alienated and isolated.
Between
February 2016 and January 2017 Albury collected information about how the
FBI recruited informants and identified potential extremists. The tactics reeked of profiling and
intimidating minority communities, he thought.
He could have filed complaints with the FBI, but he didn’t believe that
would do any good. So he leaked the
documents to a journalist at The Intercept,
where it formed the basis for a series on FBI
practices. He became a
whistleblower.
Albury could have approached the problem differently. He might have decided that he was just
stressed and the problem wasn’t that big a deal after all. And not one that he was going to change any
time soon. He could have complained
internally if it made him feel any better.
He might have held on for three years to get his retirement,
and then complained to The Intercept or anyone else who cared. Or he could have helped the people the FBI
mistreated. That might have been good.
Instead he got sucked into the whistleblower role. Maybe he was going to be the next Daniel Ellsberg or Edward Snowden. Unfortunately he played the fool, setting the
stage for Reality
Winner.
Similar to Snowden, Winner was an intelligence contractor
who grabbed NSA information. Hers was a May 5, 2017 report on Russian
cyberattacks. Four days later she
decided the government was going to conceal the information. She mailed a copy to The Intercept, which then
called the government about its story. The
FBI learned about the call on June 1, and they arrested
Winner on June 3. Her big disclosure
was soon common
knowledge from a variety of sources.
Winner was sentenced
to 5 years in prison. Burned by The
Intercept. For nothing.
Albury took more care than Winner would, he sent his 25+ files
to The Intercept in encrypted
emails. He changed file formats to
avoid detection. But The Intercept
burned him too. They sent a FOIA
request to the FBI about two of the secret documents. The agency was surprised the requester knew
the name of a secret document. It checked
who had accessed the files. A few did,
but Albury was the only one who copied portions of the files into another
document. Office cameras caught Albury
taking photos of his computer screen while he was accessing other files. A January
2018 search warrant led to the discovery of more classified files at his
home. In April he agreed to a guilty plea,
and he was sentenced to four
years in prison.
For some, blowing the whistle is quite rational. It’s like a business decision to get an
expected return. Maybe their employer
cheated them out of wages or illegally discriminated against them, and they
want what is due to them. Or they file an
FCA lawsuit hoping
to recover a reward.
The rest of us are “ethical” whistleblowers, driven by
emotions and moral judgment. The outcome
from our whistleblowing will determine how foolish we were in our projects.
I thought I was justified in my
complaints about the behavior of HomeFirst
Services of Santa Clara County. They
were all ignored or considered immaterial.
After I was fired, the
State of California determined that I was no whistleblower at all and did
not deserve the protection
I sought. But I was close enough to
retirement to manage, and I stopped legal action before it cost me too much. I was just a little foolish.
Albury and Winner proved to be quite foolish
whistleblowers. They had a lot at stake
because they were both fairly young and Albury had a family to support. They went up against very powerful
organizations that have a sympathetic audience in today’s America. They used a media outlet that would inadvertently
reveal their identities. Their disclosures
were not big news to anyone. Nor did
they disclose striking moral or legal violations. Although they were both sentenced to years in
prison and ruined lives, they accomplished nothing.
Even if other options are available, we are attracted to
becoming whistleblowers. We are pushed
by some dissatisfaction. Maybe some
anger. Possibly a sense that the
situation is unjust. We are pulled along
through the dangers by the myth of the idolized whistleblower. If we are lucky, we stop short of being too
foolish.
No comments:
Post a Comment